FP Article 19
The
Psychological Strengths of a Saver
by Rajen Devadason
Savings represent much more than mere money
value. They are the proof that the saver is
worth something in himself.
Rudyard Kipling
|
No one loves a miser. Neither does
any normal person like to hang
around a deadbeat!
As with most things
in life, the road to personal and
social stature is paved with 'bricks
of balance'. In the realm of
financial planning, the existence of
a healthy degree of balance is best
exhibited by a person's savings
profile.
So, by that
yardstick, are you a healthy saver
of money or a craven miser or a
spineless leech? |
I realise that no one knows your precise
financial situation as well as you do. But
regardless of whether you are swimming in money
or drowning in debt or merely getting by, the
way to fiscal - meaning budgetary - health is to
make a personal commitment to yourself to become
a disciplined saver of money. Doing so will have
far-reaching positive effects upon your life and
that of your family.
This is an article on recognising
the key psychological strengths
exhibited by a saver of money. I hope you enjoy
reading it. But if it isn't what
you're looking for, you're welcome
to search for something that better meets
your needs. Thank you for allowing
me to serve you.
Rajen Devadason |
|
In this day and age, it is
becoming ever harder to naturally drift into a
life of fiscal responsibility and healthy
saving. The clarion calls of advertisers assail
us from every nook and crevice, tempting us with
ever more attractive ways of separating us -
permanently - from our money.
You probably don't need me to
tell you what an appropriate saving level might
be. I believe deep down inside you already know
what it should be. But to help you bring that
level of comprehension up to the surface of your
consciousness, I'd like to invite you to carry
out a brief 5-step exercise:
1. Think
of how many years you have been working.
For instance, if you're 36 right now and only
started work after earning a couple of degrees
at university, you may have spent 12 years in
the workforce.
2.
Figure out how much you've set aside from all
those years of working. Perhaps
you've earned $500,000 in that period, but only
have $25,000 in savings and investments to show
for it.
3.
Calculate how much, on average, you've set aside
each year of your working life to date.
In this example, it works out to only a little
bit over $2,000 a year.
4. Now
ask yourself what will happen in the future if
you continue spending and saving your money in
the same ratio. You might like to
print out this article and write down your
personal thoughts here:
____________________________________________________ |
____________________________________________________ |
____________________________________________________ |
____________________________________________________ |
____________________________________________________ |
5. Finally,
bear in mind that most of us need to wisely use
the money that flows into our lives to do three
things:
a. Pay
for our current lifestyle;
b. Pay
for our past excesses that still linger as
consumer debts; and
c. Pay
for our future expenses, particularly during
retirement when we won't earn an active income.
My personal definition of a miser
is someone who hoards perhaps 75% or more of his
income, never giving himself permission to live
a decent life now.
Similarly, my definition of a
wastrel is someone who doesn't bother to save
even 10% of her net income. Most such
individuals eventually end up becoming deadbeats
(meaning they aren't able to pay their debts) or
leeches (meaning they endlessly rely on others
to take care of them).
In my day-to-day work as a
Malaysian Securities Commission-licensed
financial planner who specialises in shocking
people out of their retirement funding
complacency, I regularly work with consulting
clients to develop a long-term programme to
build up from whatever their savings level is
right now toward what I deem to be a healthy 40%
to 50% of net income.
That may strike you as being
unrealistically high. Then set your own target
savings level.
My rationale - for myself and for
my elite consulting clients - in setting a 40%
to 50% net savings rate - is that almost all of
us will one day face the day when our active
income dries up!
Those who will thrive after that
point is reached will be the ones who have
prudently and wisely created permanent passive
income streams out of a portion of their
temporary active income streams, like salaries
and business profits.
The best way to create such
permanent future streams of cash into your life
is to invest wisely. But before there can be
money to invest wisely, there must be money
saved sagely!
Rudyard Kipling, the English
novelist with the rapier wit, once pointed out:
"Savings represent much more
than mere money value. They are the proof that
the saver is worth something in himself. Any
fool can waste; any fool can muddle; but it
takes something more of a man to save and the
more he saves the more of a man he makes of
himself. Waste and extravagance unsettle a man’s
mind for every crisis; thrift, which means some
form of self-restraint, steadies it.”
It is your life and it is your
money. Therefore, you may choose to accept
Kipling's point of view or reject it. But do
remember: In all of life, important choices
lead to consequences.
I, therefore, made the decision a
long time ago to accept Kipling's point of view
in this matter.
In closing, if you'd like
additional guidance on this subject, you're
welcome to read my article
How To Start Saving Money.
(If you
happen to be a Malaysian who is looking for
professional help in the area of personal
finance, I suggest you also check out the
CFP Directory
of the
Financial Planning
Association of Malaysia. More
specifically, if you're a Malaysian who is
between 30 and 45, is very, very, very serious
about this subject, and if you want to learn
more about
my consulting services,
you may do so
here.)
© Rajen Devadason